LET ME BUILD Take part 05

01 Owner-builder freedom / European Union

The right to build your own home

The idea behind letmebuild.eu is that owning land should include the right to build a home on it, using your own work and making your own decisions about how you want to live. We consider this a fundamental right, and we want EU law to state it explicitly.

DANGLINGTONEU / OWNER-BUILDER
An illustrative plan of an owner-built home A parcel boundary encloses a dwelling, workshop, solar installation and rainwater tank. The drawing illustrates the campaign's scope. 01 / DWELLING 02 / WORKSHOP SOLAR PARCEL BOUNDARY RAINWATER AUXILIARY BUILDING
Illustrative site planHome and auxiliary buildings

The proposed right

This campaign concerns homes built for the owner's own housing, together with the auxiliary buildings that serve them (a shed for tools, for example, or a workshop). It covers construction undertaken alone or with other people, with restrictions limited to what is necessary and proportionate to prevent harm extending beyond the owner's land.

The Charter (Art. 17) protects ownership and use of property, and we want to add explicit protection for construction. Our aim is an EU-level right that binds every member state and gives an owner a legal basis for challenging interference with the construction of their own home.

Proposed legal textArticle X

Article X. Right to construct one's home.

  1. Everyone has the right to construct, alone or with others, on land they own, a dwelling for their own housing and the auxiliary buildings serving it.
  2. The exercise of this right may be restricted only to prevent harm extending beyond the owner's land, and only by measures necessary and proportionate to that harm.
  3. Structures for industry, or for the production or storage of hazardous materials, are not covered by paragraph 1.
Legal basis and the proposed amendment

The Charter (Art. 17) permits regulation of property use in the general interest. Its current scope, defined in Article 51, binds member states when they implement EU law; making the proposed construction right apply to every national building decision therefore requires changes to the Treaty/Charter framework, including its reach.

02 Reasons for the campaign

Ownership, responsibility and permission to build

Responsibility for your own home

Building your own home means taking responsibility for decisions that affect your daily life: how the structure is designed, which materials you use, how it is maintained, and what happens when something needs fixing. We want the law to recognize the owner's authority to make those decisions and undertake the work personally.

The restriction proposed above concerns effects such as wastewater reaching a neighbor's well or a fire spreading onto adjoining land. Rules can address that harm directly. A future sale would bring disclosure and buyer protections into consideration, with obligations attached to that transaction.

One existing example is Warren County, Missouri, whose published rules specify zoning setbacks and state that the county has no building codes or final inspections. The document describes requirements that property owners can read for themselves, including distances from roads and property boundaries.

Warren County's published requirements

The county's setback rules (PDF) describe its zoning requirements and the absence of building codes and final inspections; other applicable laws remain in force.

Technical review and accountability

A requirement to obtain approval should come with an explanation of what is being checked, who is qualified to check it, and what responsibility that person carries for their decision. Checking a roof's load calculations requires engineering knowledge, including the ability to establish whether the design assumptions and calculations apply to the structure being built.

The owner should have access to the applicable code, the review criteria, and the qualifications of the people making technical judgments. Each permit requirement should have a stated purpose, with its fees and processing time accounted for, so that the owner can understand the work performed and question a decision on specific grounds.

Competence and documented work

Estonia allows a qualified installer to certify specified work on an existing compliant low-voltage installation, protected at up to 35 A, without a separate pre-use audit. This involves tests, measurements, a visual inspection and written confirmation, all of which provide evidence about the installation and the work performed.

We want owners to have a route to demonstrate competence and document their own work, with the required evidence stated in advance. Electrical faults can cause shock or fire, so a licensing restriction needs a specific justification explaining the harm it prevents and why that restriction is necessary.

Personal responsibility includes the ability to make binding declarations about one's decisions. Under eIDAS (Art. 25(2)), qualified electronic signatures carry legal force; our proposal calls for owners to be able to document their construction work and take responsibility for the declarations they make about it.

Electrical work and electronic signatures
  • Estonia's TTJA guidance on electrical installations (Estonian) describes the exception for qualifying work on existing compliant installations by an installer with the required qualification, including a level 4 electrical qualification.
  • TTJA's home safety guidance identifies fire and electric shock as risks associated with defective wiring.
  • eIDAS (Art. 25(2)) governs the legal effect of qualified electronic signatures, while legal formalities for mortgages and property transactions remain applicable.

The history of control over building and land

The Code of Hammurabi, from about 1750 BC, regulated building work done for someone else: a builder whose house collapsed and killed its owner was punished. It said nothing about people building for themselves.

Control over building trades subsequently included chartered guilds: London's Carpenters' Company received a royal charter in 1477, and Glasgow's Wrights secured a monopoly on carpentry in their city. Feudal tenure subjected landholding to a lord's authority, and serfdom in Estonia was abolished through the reforms of 1816–1819.

Allodial title describes the ownership this campaign seeks: land held from no one, with the owner exercising authority over its use. This is the political aim of the campaign, and achieving the rights proposed here requires changes to the laws currently governing construction and land use.

Historical sources

Justification for restrictions

Every requirement to obtain permission should have a current justification that identifies the harm involved and explains why the restriction is necessary. For a shed used to store tools, for example, the authority should be able to describe the effect on adjoining land that it intends to prevent and show how its requirement addresses that effect.

Under our proposal, a restriction would depend on evidence of harm extending beyond the owner's land and on the proportionality of the measure being imposed. This would give the owner specific grounds on which to examine and challenge the authority's decision.

A right binding every member state

We want EU law to place an explicit limit on the power to refuse an owner permission to build their own home. The proposed right would bind every member state, with restrictions subject to the conditions set out in the article above.

This requires a change to the Treaty/Charter framework that establishes the right and its reach. The campaign's European Parliament petition is intended to put that demand on record and seek political support for the amendment.

03 Emergency access

Access to private land during an emergency

Our proposed access rules would leave the decision with the owner during war or an emergency, with permission granted case by case for a stated purpose. For example, an approaching forest fire gives the owner a direct interest in allowing firefighters to cross the parcel or stage equipment there.

Access would carry a tax credit calculated from the annual land tax, the proportion of the parcel used, the duration of use, and its intensity. The cost would be charged to the budget of the authority using the land, making that authority responsible for the financial consequences of its decision.

Calculating the access credit

credit = annual land tax × (area used / parcel area) × (days / 365) × intensity × R

Intensity multipliers used in the proposed calculation
Use of the landMultiplier
Crossing1
Staging vehicles or equipment, or creating firebreaks3
Exclusive occupation10

The incentive multiplier, R, would be fixed in law; the example below uses a value of 50.

Example of staging on a rural parcel

For a 10 ha parcel with EUR 300 in annual land tax, using 2 ha for staging over 14 days gives the following calculation:

300 × (2 / 10) × (14 / 365) × 3 × 50 = EUR 345.21

The amount before applying R is EUR 6.90, with each displayed amount rounded at the end of its calculation.

The owner could use the credit against any tax they pay (land tax, income tax, motor vehicle tax, and so on), choosing the order in which it is applied. Any unused credit would carry forward without a time limit, allowing it to be used against future tax liabilities.

Restoration would be owed in addition to the access credit, with the authority responsible for repairing damage caused by its use of the land, including destroyed fences and damaged soil. The access rules and tax entitlement described here would need to be established through legislation.

04 Resource autonomy

Building a household's own resource systems

The campaign seeks the freedom to build and maintain the systems that a household uses to provide for itself: solar and wind generation, rainwater collection, heat recovered from computation, and storage that makes energy available when it is needed.

A water tank can store solar heat for later use, heat from computing equipment can warm a room, and a sand battery can store thermal energy. Building the installation yourself involves choices about equipment, materials, maintenance and how the individual parts work together, all of which should fall within the owner's authority over their home.

Energy and environmental policy are within EU competence under Art. 191-194 TFEU, and the Renewable Energy Directive gives renewables self-consumers rights to generate, store and consume their own energy, subject to its conditions. We want to extend those rights to expressly cover off-grid installations and the owner's personal work on them.

The proposed energy-autonomy law

For off-grid installations on the owner's land and serving their own use, we want legislation that establishes the following rights:

  • The owner may install and operate the equipment without obtaining a permit.
  • The installation is subject to no area or capacity cap.
  • The owner may personally build, maintain and repair the installation.
  • Any restriction must be necessary and proportionate to preventing harm extending beyond the owner's land.

The proposal includes a household's use of recovered heat, with the owner free to install the heat exchangers, pipes and storage needed to make use of it. The intended result is a resource system that the owner can design, understand and maintain personally.

Legal basis for the energy proposal
  • Art. 191-194 TFEU cover environment and energy, with limits and specific legislative procedures; the proposed permit exemption requires legislation within that framework.
  • Article 21 of the Renewable Energy Directive sets out rights for renewables self-consumers, which we propose to extend with the off-grid and personal-installation guarantees described above.

05 Taking part

How we intend to pursue these changes

The campaign is organized around a petition to the European Parliament, a European Citizens' Initiative concerning resource autonomy, and a practical construction project in Estonia.

  1. Petition to the European Parliament

    We intend to use Art. 227 TFEU to put the right to construct on record and seek support for the necessary Treaty/Charter amendment, pursuing this alongside the energy initiative.

  2. European Citizens' Initiative

    The initiative would request an energy-autonomy law within the EU's legislative powers, beginning with the formation of an organizing group and an application for registration, followed by the collection of statements of support.

  3. Construction and documentation

    The practical project is an off-grid, self-built home on rural land in Estonia, with the construction work and the rules encountered during it documented as part of the campaign.

European Citizens’ Initiative / Organizing group

Recruiting organizers in six other member states

A European Citizens' Initiative needs an organizing group of at least seven EU citizens resident in seven different member states. One seat is filled, and we are looking for people resident in six other member states who want to help organize the initiative.

Members must be old enough to vote in European Parliament elections, and sitting MEPs are excluded from the required minimum of seven. If you would like to take part, email your country of residence and a description of how you would like to help:

simon@letmebuild.eu

Research, translation and documentation of building rules are open to everyone interested in the campaign, and you can use this address to get involved in that work.

Petition and initiative requirements
  • The European Parliament's guidance on Art. 227 TFEU describes the right to petition; admissibility requires a matter within the EU's fields of activity that directly affects the petitioner, and Treaty amendments require the applicable revision procedure.
  • The European Citizens' Initiative guide explains the process, while Regulation (EU) 2019/788, Article 5, sets out the organizing group's requirements. A successful initiative requires at least one million valid statements of support, with national thresholds met in at least seven member states, and obliges the Commission to respond; enactment requires the applicable legislative procedure.